
by: Simone Shadd
Sonia Sanchez’s words, while prolific on page, are certainly more powerful when spoken. However, “blk / rhetoric” is impactful either way. When Sanchez asks who is going to make “beautiful blk / rhetoric mean something,” she is highlighting white America’s inability to recognize the cultural richness of the black community (Sanchez 713). If something lacks meaning it is because the culture in which it exists participates in the type of erasure that results more from purposeful avoidance rather than active denouncement. At the end of the list of empty consolation prizes given to the younger black generation by their white counterparts Sanchez condemns the “quick / fucks in the hall / way of wite / america’s mind,” because it is unfair of white America to enjoy black culture while actively discriminating against black people and reducing them to “catch / phrases,” (Sanchez 713). Do you think Sanchez is correct in her assessment of white engagement with black rhetoric? Why or why not?
Work Cited
Sanchez, Sonia. “blk/ rhetoric”. The Norton Anthology of African American Literature, vol.2, 3rd ed., edited by Henry Louis Gates, Jr. and Valerie A. Smith, W.W Norton & Company, 2014, pp. 713.



